It dawned on me the other day that this old piece I did of the Amy/Andrew dualism ( [link] ), that Andrew was really an early manifestation of Charlie ( [link] ) all along.

Points to those of you (maybe three people) who even know why this is significant.

Anyway, I should draw a new Andrew based on my current concept from the Smackdown game. (SvR '10 SUCKED ASS BTW. The character creation system was developed on board a big fat failboat, aparently.)

---------

Having read a good bit of Marlowe now, I have to now COMPLETELY disagree with the greater part of the Marlovian theory, ie. Marlowe = Shakespeare. They read completely differently. Marlowe reads more like average first-person dialogue (with the Elizabethan syntax, of course), and Shakespeare is more whimsical and lyrical. I had to love Doctor Faustus though - the man is so full of himself that he refers to himself in the third person, even when he's talking TO himself.

Now the part of the theory about Marlowe faking his death...now that could be true. The whole death story sounds too fishy to me. I also have other reasons. The same people who know about the Charlie thing above will know about my Marlowe reasons.

----------

So to cover my historical M.O.:

Marlowe: not Shakespeare, "disappeared" in 1593, bisexual

Avidius Cassius: Pretty Spry For An Old Guy (ie, Marcus Aurelius' parents' age)

Domitia Lucilla: lived past Cassius (d. 175), about 10 years younger

If anyone even reads this and might ask, NO, I cannot prove any of this with facts. I'm not toting it as real world trufax, and I don't expect anyone else to think so just because I say so. This is just my personal fill-in-the gaps based on...things none of you would probably believe anyway.

---------

&

Clubs/Comms